An investigation has thrown a spotlight on Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2009 book “Smart on Crime,” revealing an alarming penchant for plagiarism that could earn her a grade of “C” or perhaps worse in any introductory writing class. Chris Rufo, a conservative activist and self-described “plagiarism hunter’s worst nightmare,” recently exposed this ethical landmine on social media. The unearthing of this literary scandal isn’t just a bad look for Harris; it’s the latest episode in the ongoing saga of her political career, which seems to be littered with half-baked ideas and questionable integrity.
According to Rufo’s thread on X, Dr. Stefan Weber, an Austrian expert in plagiarism detection, found that Harris had, without shame, copied several passages from various sources. The list of innocent victims includes a Wikipedia article and releases from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. It’s almost as if, instead of hitting the books, Harris decided to hit “control + C” and then “control + V.” The idea that this is the same woman often touted as a leader on justice reform becomes even more ironic when one considers her blatant disregard for honesty on the page.
In one spectacular example, Harris replicated an entire Wikipedia entry on the Midtown Community Court, only altering a mere two words. The juxtaposition is comical; it’s as if she thought changing “the” to “a” was sufficient to maintain plausible deniability. This type of plundering would likely get a student an F in any writing course, but for Harris, it appears there are no academic penalties—only political ones.
The pattern continues with excerpts from a John Jay College of Criminal Justice press release, which she lifted, with changes so minor they might have been considered an afterthought. Instead of writing from her own experiences and insights, Harris seemed more engaged in a high-stakes copy-and-paste contest. One could almost hear the cries of “just do your own research!” echoing from concerned citizens. An academic engagement would have involved her evaluating and synthesizing the material critically, but Harris appears more interested in quantity over integrity.
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1845993012100583502&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fconservativeadvocacy.com%2Fkamala-harris-accused-of-plagiarism-in-2009-book-faces-criticism%2F&sessionId=c283204bae3d964e63dfab687070aa942580ebac&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px
The fallout from Rufo’s discoveries has drawn the attention of GOP figures like Ohio Senator J.D. Vance, who sharpened his criticism with good humor. Vance seized the opportunity to rib Harris, proclaiming that she didn’t even write her own book, which will serve as a delightful punchline for conservatives everywhere. Vance went as far as forecasting the media’s response, presaging the predictable defense that downplays the seriousness of Harris’s literary theft. Yet this controversy raises important questions about the capabilities of a person deemed ready to step into the Oval Office.
With Harris under fire, her co-author Joan O’C. Hamilton has seemingly opted out of the conversation, which could indicate her reluctance to dive into the quagmire of potential embarrassment. The silence from both the Harris camp and Hamilton suggests that they are scrambling to navigate the fallout from this unfolding literary scandal. If nothing else, “Smart on Crime” should perhaps be retitled “Just Another Attempt to Pass Off Others’ Work as My Own.” As the dust settles, this incident poses a significant challenge for Harris’s credibility and the Democrats at large.
